Chapter 4: The Satanic-Military Media-Conplex

 *§1. SATANIC MILITARY MEDIA COMPLEX*

TV‑CENTRIC ERA → COHESION

One screen

One narrative

One shared reality

High trust

Stable norms

Predictable politics

Low volatility

POST‑TV FRAGMENTATION → DISUNITY

Many screens

Many narratives

No shared facts

Low trust

Polarisation

Institutional weakness

Fast emotional cycles

SMARTPHONE / SOCIAL MEDIA ERA → INSTABILITY

Algorithmic tribes

Micro‑realities

Rumour acceleration

Consensus collapse

Reactive behaviour

Identity conflict

Information overload

SOCIAL CONSEQUENCES

Cohesion drops

Misunderstanding rises

Groups isolate

Conflict escalates

Norms destabilise

Public opinion swings

Collective rhythm breaks

GEOPOLITICAL CONSEQUENCES

Weaker national unity

Harder coordination

Faster misinformation spread

Higher internal tension

External manipulation easier

Unpredictable global behaviour

Reduced stability

CORE MECHANISM

Centralised media → cohesive society → stable geopolitics

Decentralised media → fragmented society → unstable geopolitics

*§2. A Failed State*

Non‑bounded ⇒ non‑ownable.

Non‑exclusive ⇒ non‑ownable.

Non‑controllable ⇒ non‑ownable.

Non‑conformal ⇒ non‑ownable.

Non‑bounded

→ borders unclear, unenforced, or collapsing

→ the system cannot define its domain.

Non‑exclusive

→ cannot maintain exclusive authority within its territory

→ parallel powers, factions, or external actors override it.

Non‑controllable

→ cannot enforce decisions, laws, or outcomes

→ no operational capacity.

Non‑conformal

→ does not conform to the concept‑idea of a “state”

→ lacks the agreement‑structure that grants legitimacy.

UNIFIED STRUCTURAL LAW

Non‑bounded  ⇒ non‑definable.

Non‑definable ⇒ non‑exclusive.

Non‑exclusive ⇒ non‑controllable.

Non‑controllable ⇒ non‑conformal.

Non‑conformal ⇒ non‑valid.

This applies to:

- secrets,

- ownership,

- statehood,

- sovereignty,

- any claimed domain or authority.

SECRET

If it is bounded, definable, exclusive, controllable, and conformal ⇒ it can be a secret.

If any fail ⇒ not a secret.

OWNERSHIP

If the domain is bounded, definable, exclusive, controllable, and conformal ⇒ ownership is possible.

If any fail ⇒ ownership collapses.

STATEHOOD

If the territory is bounded, definable, exclusive, controllable, and conformal ⇒ statehood is valid.

If any fail ⇒ failed state.

VALIDITY = bounded + definable + exclusive + controllable + conformal.

INVALIDITY = failure of any component.

*§3. The R3=>R4=>R5 Credit Card & The Lobotomy Tax*

Someone’s Business <=> Not Your Business <=> Not My Business 

Migration Tool

Proxy

Ponce

Terrorism

Terrorist Grid - Terrorist Network - Terrorist Groups

Terrorists

*§4. Bowling for Columbo*

Bottom 50% — own almost none of the world’s wealth (close to zero or negative net wealth).

Bottom 90% — own less than 20% of global wealth combined.

Top 10% — own around 75% of global wealth.

Top 1% — own around 40–48% of global wealth.

Top 0.1% — own roughly 20% of global wealth.

Top 0.01% — own more than the bottom 50% combined.

Top 0.001% — own more wealth than the bottom 90% of humanity.

*§5. NOT My Business*

Your Business 

Your Order

Your Country / Nationality 

Your Race / Ethnicity 

Your Religion / Creed / Group

(Not Mine)

=> 

Your Conflict (Not Mine)

*YOUR CONFLICT‑TERM SPECTRUM*

1. misunderstanding

2. issue

3. concern

4. grievance

5. dispute

6. friction

7. clash

8. run‑in

9. quarrel

10. contention

=>

Your Knowledge-Meaning-Values

Your Work To Process Mentally 

Your Work To Perform Physically 

(Not Mine)

=>

Your Work For Your Own Business

(None of My Business)

=> 

Do Your Own Work

(I Cannot Do Your Work or Its Counterpart)

Chapter 3: Sovereignty 303

 §1. SOVEREIGNTY SYNCRETIZATION

The structured coordination of multiple sovereignties without dissolving their distinctions.

Core principles:

- Autonomy is preserved.

- Cooperation is enabled through protocols, not sameness.

- Boundaries remain intact.

- Coordination replaces domination.

- Stability emerges from structured coexistence.

Definition:

Sovereignty Syncretization = the method by which distinct sovereignties operate together without merging identities, diluting structure, or collapsing into conflict.

§2. SOVEREIGNTY ⇄ CONFEDERACY

A dual architecture for stability in a fragmented world.

DUAL STRUCTURE

Sovereignties = autonomous units  

Confederacy = coordination framework  

Each preserves itself.  

Each cooperates through shared protocols.

THE PROBLEM

Loss of central media → loss of shared reality  

Fragmented feeds → fragmented identities  

No common narrative → no cohesion  

High reactivity → high conflict  

Low trust → low stability  

INEVITABLE CONDITIONS

1. Permanent plurality of realities  

2. Permanent micro-tribes  

3. Permanent information asymmetry  

4. Permanent volatility in public opinion  

5. Permanent decentralisation of authority  

THE SOLUTION

1. TRIBAL COOPERATION  

   Local micro-groups coordinate through shared goals, not shared narratives.  

   Micro-cohesion replaces macro-cohesion.

2. NETWORKED FEDERATION  

   Distinct sovereignties linked by:  

   - shared protocols  

   - shared norms  

   - conflict-avoidance rules  

   - resource agreements  

3. FUNCTIONAL COMMON GROUND  

   Shared infrastructure, safety norms, communication standards, crisis protocols.  

   Not shared beliefs — shared function.

4. DISTRIBUTED TRUST SYSTEMS  

   Trust shifts from central institutions to:  

   - community groups  

   - professional networks  

   - transparent processes  

   - reputation systems  

5. LOW-CONFLICT TRIBALISM  

   Sovereignties remain distinct but:  

   - cooperate on essentials  

   - avoid zero-sum framing  

   - maintain boundaries without hostility  

   - coordinate through incentives

*§3. NATIONAL SECURITY* 

THREE PILLARS OF SOVEREIGNTY ⇄ CONFEDERACY

PILLAR 1 — COLLECTIVE INTENSITY OUTLETS

Societies need peaceful, structured ways to:

- mobilise together

- release accumulated pressure

- experience shared purpose

- coordinate at scale

Without substitutes, conflict becomes the default outlet.

Unchanneled collective intensity → instability.

PILLAR 2 — CULTIVATING AND RETURNING THE BEST

Progress occurs when:

- capable individuals are identified

- refined in broader environments

- trained to translate refinement back home

- reintegrated at a pace their sovereignty can absorb

This circulates excellence without erasing identity.

Refinement → translation → reintegration → uplift.

PILLAR 3 — MANUFACTURED DEPENDENCY (FAILURE MODE)

A destructive loop where:

1. A problem is sustained

2. Blame is redirected

3. Relationships form around the problem

4. Control is justified through narrative

5. The problem is kept alive to maintain reliance

Controlled opposition:

- both sides shaped by the same force

- conflict predictable

- narrative controlled

- hostility recycled

- no sovereignty develops

CLOSED-LOOP FAILURE  

Manufacture → resentment → conflict → return → deeper resentment → repeat.

OPEN-LOOP SOLUTION  

1. Provide peaceful high-intensity substitutes.  

2. End dependency loops.  

3. Develop the best individuals.  

4. Equip them to translate refinement.  

5. Return them to uplift their group.  

6. Replace manipulation with coordination.

CANONICAL FORM  

- Stability requires peaceful outlets for collective intensity.  

- Progress requires cultivating and returning the best.  

- Collapse occurs through manufactured dependency and closed-loop hostility.

KIM PEAK 1-LINER  

Outlet → uplift → no manipulation loops.

Chapter 2: Sovereignty 202

 *§1. Credit Card*

Astral Plane 

Astral-Net , Drag-Net , Phishing-Net

It is independent of

If it is claimed to be owned it must be by concept-idea, and agreement - conformity to - conformal to

If it is claimed to be a secret, it cannot be

The DiHydrogen-Monoxide may well be unknown therefore a secret but the Tsunami certainly will necessarily not be

One is default-defactoed into the astral plane system set up rendering to the extent and degree to which it impact-influence-interferes=>implicates oneself

It is non-deferrable, displaceable, dissociatable.

You are responsible for your own thoughts and actions and thus the benchmark for assessment evaluation of oneself whether you choose to follow orders or unthink.

§2. A. RESPONSIBILITY DEFINITION

MINIMAL RESPONSIBILITY

1. awareness

2. acknowledgement

3. recognition

4. noticing

5. observing

BASE RESPONSIBILITY

6. ownership

7. acceptance

8. answerability

9. duty

10. obligation

FUNCTIONAL RESPONSIBILITY

11. role‑responsibility

12. task‑responsibility

13. scope‑responsibility

14. operational responsibility

15. situational responsibility

CAUSAL RESPONSIBILITY

16. involvement

17. contribution

18. participation

19. causal influence

20. causal impact

ACCOUNTABILITY RESPONSIBILITY

21. being accountable

22. being liable

23. being answerable

24. being held to account

25. bearing consequences

MORAL / ETHICAL RESPONSIBILITY

26. ought‑responsibility

27. value‑responsibility

28. principle‑responsibility

29. integrity‑responsibility

30. self‑governance

SOVEREIGN RESPONSIBILITY

31. self‑authorship

32. self‑determination

33. self‑benchmarking

34. thought‑responsibility

35. action‑responsibility

ULTIMATE RESPONSIBILITY

36. total ownership

37. non‑deferrable responsibility

38. non‑displaceable responsibility

39. non‑dissociatable responsibility

40. you are responsible for yourself

§2. B. SECRET — DEFINITION

A “secret” is information that is:

1. unknown,

2. undisclosed,

3. inaccessible,

4. and non‑inferable

to the relevant observer or system.

If any of these fail, it is not a secret.

§2. C. OWNERSHIP — DEFINITION

Ownership is:

1. control,

2. authority,

3. responsibility,

4. and recognised claim

over a thing, concept, or domain.

If any of these fail, ownership is not present.

CRITERIA FOR OWNERSHIP

1. RECOGNITION

   The ownership claim is acknowledged by the relevant system, group, or framework.

2. IDENTIFIABILITY

   The owned thing is definable, distinguishable, and referable.

3. CONTROL

   The owner can direct, restrict, modify, or permit use.

4. AUTHORITY

   The owner has the legitimate right to exercise control.

5. EXCLUSIVITY

   The owner can exclude others from control or use.

6. RESPONSIBILITY

   The owner bears consequences for the thing’s use, misuse, or impact.

7. TRANSFERABILITY

   The ownership can be assigned, delegated, or relinquished.

8. PERSISTENCE

   The ownership continues across time unless explicitly changed.

9. AGREEMENT‑CONFORMITY

   Ownership exists only if:

   - the concept is defined,

   - the claim conforms to that concept,

   - and the system agrees to the conformity.

If any criterion fails → ownership is not valid.

Chapter 1: Sovereignty 101

 §1. Sovereignty Classifications

Individual Sovereignty 

→ Your own autonomy and responsibility.

The Whole Sovereignty

→ The collective system’s autonomy.

Relative Sovereignty

→ Your sovereignty compared to others.

Delusional Sovereignty

→ Claiming sovereignty without capacity or responsibility.

Individual Sovereignty

→ Your autonomy, agency, responsibility, and decision‑space.

The Whole Sovereignty

→ Collective autonomy: systems, groups, institutions, shared constraints.

Relative Sovereignty

→ Your sovereignty measured against others’ sovereignty; comparative power.

Delusional Sovereignty

→ Claimed sovereignty without capacity, responsibility, or realism.

$2. Sovereignty Evaluation 

4 TYPES:

I = Individual

W = Whole

R = Relative

D = Delusional

3 CLASSES:

Real = I, W

Relative = R

Delusional = D

2‑POINT EVALUATION:

I = Preserve | Impair

W = Preserve | Impair

SOVEREIGNTY SCORE :=

Sovereign System → (I , W)

§3. PROPERTIES AND CONDITIONS 

INDIVIDUAL (Nature / Structure)

1. COHERENCE

   Structural stability of the system’s internal logic.

2. CONSISTENCY

   Alignment of claim, action, and outcome.

3. ORIENTATION

   The direction the system tends toward when free to act.

4. PURPOSE

   The intended effect or role of the system.

5. OPERATION

   What the system actually does in practice.

6. BOUNDARY

   The threshold beyond which the system loses itself.

EVALUATION OF ONE (Properties / Attributes)

7. INTEGRITY

   The system remaining itself under contact or pressure.

8. RESILIENCE

   Recovery without loss of form.

9. CONGRUENCE

   Internal and external alignment of structure and function.

RELATION (Between Two Systems)

10. COMPATIBILITY

    Mutual non‑interference; ability to coexist without damage.

11. INTERSECTION

    The moment of contact: reinforce, adjust, absorb, distort, cancel.

12. INTERACTION

    The ongoing dynamic pattern across time.

§4. Sovereignty Vs Sovereignty

→ Both sovereignties strengthen.

Compromise

→ Mutual reduction to coexist.

Jeopardise

→ One endangers the other.

Selfish‑Gain

→ One benefits at the other’s expense.

Self‑Aggrandizement

→ Inflated, false sovereignty claim.

Sacrifice

→ One gives up sovereignty for another.

Detriment

→ Both lose sovereignty.

Gain

→ Both sovereignties increase; mutual empowerment.

Compromise

→ Both reduce sovereignty to enable coexistence or coordination.

Jeopardise

→ One sovereignty threatens or destabilises the other.

Selfish‑Gain

→ One increases sovereignty by extracting it from the other.

Self‑Aggrandizement

→ Inflated, performative sovereignty claim; no real increase.

Sacrifice

→ One voluntarily gives up sovereignty to strengthen the other.

Detriment

→ Both lose sovereignty due to conflict, incompetence, or misalignment.

SOVEREIGNTY ⇄ CONFEDERACY

§. SECTION I

CHAPTER 1 - SOVEREIGNTY 101

  Part I. Sovereignty Classifications

  Part II. Sovereignty Evaluation

  Part III. Properties and Conditions

  Part IV. Sovereignty vs. Sovereignty

CHAPTER 2 - SOVEREIGNTY 202

  Part I. Credit Card

  Part II. A. Responsibility Definition

  Part II. B. Secret Definition

  Part II. C. Ownership Definition

CHAPTER 3 - SOVEREIGNTY 303

  Part I. Sovereignty Syncretisation

  Part II. Sovereignty Confederacy

  Part III. National Security

§. SECTION II

CHAPTER 4 — SATANIC MILITARY MEDIA COMPLEX (101)

  Part I. Satanic Military Media Complex

  Part II. A Failed State

  Part III. Bowling For Columbo

  Part IV. R3→R4→R5 Credit Card + The Lobotomy Tax

  Part V. NOT My Business 

CHAPTER 5 — REMOTE MIND CONTROL (202)

  Part I. Spectrum of Cognitive Influence and Identity Override

  Part II. Spectrum of Group‑Bound Cognitive and Social Patterning

CHAPTER 6 — THE CO‑OPERATIVE (303)

  Part I. A Fully Co‑opted System

  Part II. The Special Case of Cybernetic Totalization

§. SECTION III: “SHORTHANDS”

CHAPTER 7 — X = 101

CHAPTER 8 — f(X) = 202

CHAPTER 9 — Y = 303

§. SECTION IV

CHAPTER 10 — SOLUTIONS

Email to Goddard

*§1. Spectrum of Cognitive Influence and Identity Override*

1. Primed

2. ⁠Conditioned

3. ⁠Socially Engineered

4. ⁠Desensitised

5. ⁠Normalised

6. ⁠Indoctrinated

7. ⁠Brainwashed

8. ⁠Dissociated

9. ⁠Reprogrammed

1. Primed — Subtle cues shift attention or expectation without conscious awareness.

2. Conditioned — Behaviour shaped through repetition, reward, or punishment loops.

3. Socially Engineered — Actions influenced by systems, norms, incentives, or media framing.

4. Desensitised — Emotional response reduced through repeated exposure, lowering sensitivity.

5. Normalised — Ideas or behaviours become accepted as the default baseline through repetition.

6. Indoctrinated — Belief system installed through structured teaching that discourages critique.

7. Brainwashed — Coercive override of cognition and identity through pressure and isolation.

8. Dissociated — Self‑concept destabilised, weakening internal resistance to external control.

9. Reprogrammed — Identity, beliefs, and behaviours overwritten and replaced with a new system.

*§2. The recurring cognitive and social patterns that can appear in tightly engineered, highly gregarious, identity‑bound groups.*

1. Reality‑Disconnection

Beliefs are maintained even when:

• evidence contradicts them

• behaviour violates stated values

• outcomes harm themselves or others

This is belief over reality.

2. Narrative‑Locking

A fixed story explains everything:

• “We are right.”

• “Others are wrong.”

• “Any contradiction is a test or attack.”

The narrative becomes self‑sealing.

3. Group‑Reinforced Certainty

Identity is fused with group approval:

• agreement = belonging

• disagreement = betrayal

This creates collective certainty, not individual thought.

4. Moral Inversion

Actions that contradict their stated ethics are reframed as:

• righteous

• necessary

• protective

• divinely justified

This allows harmful behaviour to feel virtuous.

5. Projection Loops

Internal conflict is externalised:

• their fear becomes “your threat”

• their aggression becomes “your sin”

• their insecurity becomes “your attack”

This is a self‑protective displacement mechanism.

6. Cognitive Closure

A refusal to engage with:

• nuance

• ambiguity

• alternative interpretations

• factual correction

The mind becomes sealed to new input.

7. Identity Panic

Any challenge to the belief system feels like:

• annihilation

• persecution

• existential threat

This produces overreaction and hostility.

8. Righteous Hostility

Aggression is reframed as:

• defending truth

• protecting purity

• saving others

• fighting evil

This is how harm becomes moralised.

---

Why this cluster appears

Not because of ethnicity or religion in isolation, but because of:

• tight social engineering

• group‑dependent identity

• fear‑based moral frameworks

• reward structures for conformity

• punishment structures for deviation

These produce predictable psychological patterns.

*Ԥ3. Bowling for Columbo*

Bottom 50% — own almost none of the world’s wealth (close to zero or negative net wealth).

Bottom 90% — own less than 20% of global wealth combined.

Top 10% — own around 75% of global wealth.

Top 1% — own around 40–48% of global wealth.

Top 0.1% — own roughly 20% of global wealth.

Top 0.01% — own more than the bottom 50% combined.

Top 0.001% — own more wealth than the bottom 90% of humanity.

*§4. Research Scientist #2 from Jurassic Park*

§5. *The Whole Is Greater Than The Sum Of The Parts*

I. Institution Intersection 

99:2.2 (1087.5) Institutional religion is now caught in the stalemate of a vicious circle. It cannot reconstruct society without first reconstructing itself; and being so much an integral part of the established order, it cannot reconstruct itself until society has been radically reconstructed.

99:2.3 (1087.6) Religionists must function in society, in industry, and in politics as individuals, not as groups, parties, or institutions. A religious group which presumes to function as such, apart from religious activities, immediately becomes a political party, an economic organization, or a social institution. Religious collectivism must confine its efforts to the furtherance of religious causes.

99:2.4 (1087.7) Religionists are of no more value in the tasks of social reconstruction than nonreligionists except in so far as their religion has conferred upon them enhanced cosmic foresight and endowed them with that superior social wisdom which is born of the sincere desire to love God supremely and to love every man as a brother in the heavenly kingdom. An ideal social order is that in which every man loves his neighbor as he loves himself.

II. The Constituents And The Whole

76:6.4 (854.1) It is the people who make a civilization; civilization does not make the people.

III. The Golden Rulers

71:4.16 (804.16) The appearance of genuine brotherhood signifies that a social order has arrived in which all men delight in bearing one another’s burdens; they actually desire to practice the golden rule. But such an ideal society cannot be realized when either the weak or the wicked lie in wait to take unfair and unholy advantage of those who are chiefly actuated by devotion to the service of truth, beauty, and goodness. In such a situation only one course is practical: The “golden rulers” may establish a progressive society in which they live according to their ideals while maintaining an adequate defense against their benighted fellows who might seek either to exploit their pacific predilections or to destroy their advancing civilization.

71:4.17 (804.17) Idealism can never survive on an evolving planet if the idealists in each generation permit themselves to be exterminated by the baser orders of humanity. And here is the great test of idealism: Can an advanced society maintain that military preparedness which renders it secure from all attack by its war-loving neighbors without yielding to the temptation to employ this military strength in offensive operations against other peoples for purposes of selfish gain or national aggrandizement? National survival demands preparedness, and religious idealism alone can prevent the prostitution of preparedness into aggression. Only love, brotherhood, can prevent the strong from oppressing the weak.

§6. The Electronic Condensation Equation 

I. E is equal to mc^2 as E is equal to (R/t)*Q^2

“42:4.11 (474.1) The increase of mass in matter is equal to the increase of energy divided by the square of the velocity of light. In a dynamic sense the work which resting matter can perform is equal to the energy expended in bringing its parts together from Paradise minus the resistance of the forces overcome in transit and the attraction exerted by the parts of matter on one another.“

II. Force => Energy => Power (Power Charge/Discharge)

“42:2.1 (469.1) The word energy is used to denote all phases and forms of phenomenal motion, action, and potential, while force is applied to the pregravity, and power to the postgravity, stages of energy.”

III. Time is Derivate

“118:3.1 (1297.2) Only by ubiquity could Deity unify time-space manifestations to the finite conception, for time is a succession of instants while space is a system of associated points. You do, after all, perceive time by analysis and space by synthesis. You co-ordinate and associate these two dissimilar conceptions by the integrating insight of personality.”

§7. 

On Sunday, October 5, 2025, 10:49 am, A Star <e5talior@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

Ok. 3 kittens have been dropped off at mine at the same time the criminal syndicate compromised of vets police intelligence and civil servants and citizen volunteers have decided to partake in the torture and murder of my cat. 

I cannot look after them in an environment like this and they need to be taken from me immediately. I am unable to cooperate with anyone as they are all handled to comply with these programs ; the set up assumes a premise as though this is not the case and I can do things that another ought to do like talk to neighbours and friends and family to get help or go to the veterinary to get them their mandatory injections or put up posters in the local shop; well I cannot. It’s simple. 

Please read all of the below emails and replies. Do not bother me with more nonsense as it is largely perpetrated by people of good intentions much like the great example of the Covid-19 pandemic displayed. 

Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone

On Saturday, September 27, 2025, 10:22 am, A Star <e5talior@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

Vincent is ai-entrained and handled

He goes from back garden to back garden

People have been tormenting him including veterinarians as they have also been tending to his wounds

Markings have been placed on him like petrol 

My body has been attacked by Directed Energy Weapons and other weapons technology: the aura or astral body is attacked and then what also occurs is a metric and monetisation is cast upon it and upon such they are like shares to be bought and sold by the various criminal group that want to purchase them; what can be done with it is encoding and entraining over it , giving of rights amongst themselves to program and run program modules across myself and anything else inputted into its system and made compatible with the programs.

You are associates to it so do not claim any dissociation; you may do so but this is called ‘denial/delusion/ignorance/stupidity/self-deceit/cowardice’. You work on some sort of policy PR legislative idea of things and get so degenerated that even if there is physical obvious evidence like thousands of people and their pets in this case being subjected to this you claim it is not so, even if there is audio and video evidence you do not accept. Essentially you are a front, it is not for a crooked corp to determine anything if they r so deranged as you are, and there would usually be a third party called lawyers solicitors judges police witnesses etc a legal system a judicial system that would account for the discrepancy but of course they are also part of the entire set up. One big association. Community Gang-Stalking | State-Sponsored Terrorism. You are terrorists by any means in normal parlance but of course you do not use this vernacular; you do not even use the English language. You are delusional. You are in truth in denial/delusion/ignorance/stupidity/self-deceit/cowardice. It is not for me to assume the basis of the English language and communicate to you in it if you respond in it but do not use it correctly. 

All is cyphers and indexed for you. There is no accountability. You do not care. I am expressing what is occurring: the simple facts and truths. You cannot even reply using the same context purported here because you are a stooge/front that is limited and not allowed to state these things that you do. You take NDAs and oaths and think it is ok. I merely relay the facts here for yourself. So be it, with your nonsensicality.

But I still pose the question to the vet practice and the veterinarians: Why did you take my cat and murder him? Why have you subjected him to an ‘N’ ‘E’ ‘S’ terrorist program? Why do you think it ok to lie and do this? Why do the opposite and lie? Do you think it is ok to persist with lying to me and assume your innocence like you are here to help my other cats when you have partaken in the torture abuse murder of not just my cat but thousands, millions? As this is ‘the order’ , this is your association, this is your practice. It is the practice of all institutions; you have all gotten yourselves caught up in this practice.

Lobotomized and Handled.

Ai-Entrainment & ‘NES’ terrorist programs.

Cyphering and not using proper language, facts or truths. 

Everytime I go to ‘Goddards’ it’s just a rotating-door of stooges , there may be a core permanent ‘resident’ vet but always full of stooges, stooge drs and other pet owners and receptionists. It is because you are a front. A front for your BENS system. I won’t stipulate the acronym, you all already know what it means and I’m not here to aggravate your deluded selves all too much.

So the vet cypher speaks about fleas and calling the RSPCA and that it could cause anaemia and kill him and that I am mistreating him and she could report me. I went in that day after your syndicated teams had attacked him and caused his left side of mouth to swell: part of the metric assigning allocation. Which I also have , covariant to myself. 

The whole thing is COVARIANT.

The previous visit had two different vets that were I believe tagged under ‘vet call’; I went in after he had been tortured by your syndicate by pulling his legs and dislocating his hips. And then you all think it is ok because you dissociate or are on altars - lobotomized and handled. All smiles with you guys. Like everyone else everywhere. Just smiling away ready to ‘fulfill your purport’ of helping people! But you do not. You are stooged. It is a fact. It is not an opinion. A court or intelligent person ‘needs’ evidence, you are just crooks. I won’t nit pick with your nonsense selves. You all order follow and defer and confer and entertain delusion and error.

Another vet visit has another stooge vet come in and another entrainment script is run. Caucasian wearing ‘trainers’ , not normally notable but i know your nonsense in-and-out, part of the cyphering and metric coding. Part of the fulfilling of the script : your cull scripts. As though it is all not so. Your ceremony ritual spell? It is code , you ascribe divest your erroneous knowledge/meaning/value upon what you are doing then compartmentalise it irregardless of Euclidean 3rd dimensional space geometry, and think that is what is occurring per a purport that has run so thin it no longer makes sense, you no longer make sense, the entire thing no longer makes sense. All you are going to do is sit there, because you won’t do anything because you’re a retarded person, you are no longer human beings as a matter of fact and you do not care. You are cyborg degenerate. 

What are you all doing? 

You can defer and this can ‘revert-recede’ to the special secret operation that you’re all apart of, but that is why I ask:

Why did you take my cat and torture him and murder him?

Why I are you doing this?

I don’t need answers. I don’t need justice. I am asking you as fully grown men and women who care about animals , who spend their lives dedicating themselves to learning training and then putting yourselves on a front line to be a class of people who will be there when a pet needs the help: why are you partaking in all of this animal abuse and lying and defrauding and persecution torment upon their owners on top of that? 

What are you doing? 

Why are you cyphering with people on bikes? Why are you cyphering with cars? Why are you subordinatising yourself to these programs for which you as a human being are not compatible with and subsequently becoming mere storage-vat handled dumbs? 

Why not be real men and women? Why not be what you would desire to be least sufficiently. If you want to help animals, then you need to be qualified , essentially, REQUALIFIED; because you are not qualified drs and nurses. You are more DISQUALIFIED. I am not an authority or your authority; it is up to yourselves to sort yourselves out. If you want to help animals you need to qualify yourselves to help animals and you simply are not qualified. It is a fact! You must reconsider seriously what you are doing and how you are doing it. How do you end up so corrupt as to partake in mass large scale animal abuse? How did you manage to do the opposite? Not an accident. So you help people but there exists people that help people that do not harm people, so what argument do you have? You are ‘stupid’. Why not dissociate from such practice by ACTUALLY dissociating from the practice instead of conferring and deferring.

What is wrong with yourselves?

What am I supposed to do with pets if there are only dumb vets hooked up to BENS programs? 

Everything’s ok? But it is not. You are not ok. You natsy, I mean nasty, people.

You’ve been bought.

Like the police have; like the NHS have, like the intelligence have, like the MPs have, like judges have, and like the people have. 

You’ve been degenerated into Down syndrome people. No proper agency, some full Borg. Who can tell? I can’t but I can tell you are all retarded and all have an altar personality much like that of a psychopath that thinks it’s all ok and humorous and a joy/delight, this whole enterprise. Because you’ve been assimilated, the gremlin got you. 

Then you all take the p*** out of myself on a proxy IDENTITY account because I am not compatible with the system: because I am not a retard. I am not an idiot. I am not a BENS. 

So why are you complicit in this? Across the board? 

If you think yourself moral, intelligent, responsible, respectful, decent, then why reduce yourself to this depravity? Why let it lull dupe fool you as it ai-entrain energises you to go along and get along with it’s absolute BS? What is wrong with you? Why don’t you sort yourself out? 

You are fully grown men and women and you think you act like one but in my presence you do not and cannot in spite of what it may appear to look like. Quite to the contrary.

Why are you conformal to a bunch of stooge NHS & Police calling me mentally ill - paranoid schizophrenic - then they attack harass persecute torture me every day all day - I’m 41 now; it has not and does not stop.

You think u r just a professional at that point and I am a mere client? But you come to my house and persecute torture my pets on an altar then don’t remember or your association is this association you just dissociate as and when you like , like you think you are all clever and getting away with it. Vanity. The vanity delusion, ego delusion, you all entertain. 

You are as a matter of fact, or at least psychology, mentally ill people. As the case goes a person who understands their mental illness has insight into it, it doesn’t make them not mentally ill, that would be a logical contradiction. So you are mentally ill people: you are a threat to self and others. You have delusional ideologies. 

I do not.

Why not sort yourselves out?

Why are you also pretending to being good by aiding and abetting in the full migration of the system to its new ai-based system? Thinking you are good?

We are doing a secret operation?

Is it helping anyone? No, just equipoise/counterpoise nasties. Choose whatever body type you want and animate them and that’s that. So choose happy well intentioned good natured caucasian people! Does that make this any different? No. I think you get confused with the pertaining. That person might be a well natured good caucasian that is pleasant and happy but are they that in this system? No! Necessarily not. I am not confused nor confounded by your nonsense, it looks as though you are. 

Why do you keep proxying paki accounts to myself and nigga mentally ill accounts to myself and then have happy responsible intelligent Caucasians dotted around? 

Now, why are you ALL conformal to this? You are. You being not racist for example does not make you non conformal. Voluntary, involuntary. You unwittingly partake or simply confer and defer. That is it. So the question can still be posed: why are you conformal and partaking in all of this domestic terrorism? 

It is a cabal, it is a spread, there is either a leader to tell you not to do that or a leader to tell you to do that, with that BS indifference in mind, why don’t you sort yourself out instead of f’in about? Thinking you are good fully grown men and women when you are idiot Down syndrome non human entities that are hooked up to a computer system and only perform fulfill these BENS programs?

Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone

REPLY:

On Thursday, October 2, 2025, 3:41 pm, Feedback <feedback@goddardvetgroup.co.uk> wrote:

Dear Mr A Ramasamy

 

The team at our Walthamstow practice have alerted us to a number of written communications via our Whats App Goddard Chat facility between 26^th and 29^th September.

 

The content of these messages is quite frankly, offensive and rude. You have used derogatory terms and unacceptable and insulting terminology which the team are undeserving of. Included in these lengthily barrages of abuse are vile accusations that we have murdered your cat and that we torture pets. 

 

Our teams do not deserve to be subjected to such heinous and abusive communications. Given that a relationship between a vet and their client should be based on mutual trust and respect, and this is clearly not a relationship we have with you,  we will now be deregistering you from all Goddard Vet Group practices.

 

You will now need to find another vet practice for ongoing care of your pets and a new practice can contact us for the clinical histories directly.

 

Yours Sincerely

Caroline

 

Caroline Griffiths​   Regional Manager

 

REPLY

Double-Down Syndrome 

It is a real shame to see yourselves in this mess and at the expense of the animals.

I conjecture not, I opinionate not, I guess not.

It is of facts and truths and I can prove it. You need merely receive it. You can come ‘back’ to my house and I will walk you through it. It will consist of us pertaining to things external from us that are not paranoia, made-up, misconstruings; why I could sit down and attempt to have a conversation with yourself but you will not have adequate agency to retain the consciousness and converse with myself. We could record it if you want. So you can watch yourself back but not for evidence going to a court or a judge as it is all crooked. 

Do continue to double-down all you like. I am not here to ‘whistleblow’; I asked the question and so I ask it again and so you should answer it: ‘why have you partaken in the torture of my cat and murder?’

If you think it is a false allegation and vile and insulting , it is not intentional , I cannot help that. You can come and meet me in person and we can pertain like civilised fully grown men and women and it will be irrefutable. But of course you will not. 

Do not. As you like. Get on your high-horses, on your pride, on your pretence, on your defence. Yes, get insulted, then project, that I am in error. But of course I am not.

As I say to yourselves : 

1. Cleverness is not a substitute for true character.

2. The argumentative defence of any proposition is inversely proportional to the truth contained.

I will repeat to yourself whilst you persist with your charade:

It is a real shame to see yourselves in this mess and at the expense of the animals.

Remember, this is the point. 

Debase-Rebase not:

It is a real shame to see yourselves in this mess and at the expense of the animals.